GeForce GT 8800 vs 210 |
Released February, 2008
ASUS GeForce GT 8800
- 700 MHz
- 512 MB GDDR3
by Anthony-Garreffa (Sep, 2012)If the chart is right, the HD 8870 could begin offering performance close to that of today's high-end offerings, which would really shake up the market.
VS
Released September, 2009
Nvidia GeForce 210
- 475 MHz
- 1 GB DDR2
by Usman-Pirzada (Jul, 2013)This 3W is equal to Intel’s SDP calculation which for the Haswell Fanless SoC is 4.5W. The GX-210JA will support an impressive 1Ghz Clock Speed.
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 700 MHz | vs | 475 MHz | More than 45% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher memory bandwidth | 64.6 GB/s | vs | 6.4 GB/s | More than 10x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 2,020 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | More than 2.5x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Slightly better PassMark score | 754 | vs | 177 | More than 4.2x better PassMark score | |||
| Higher texture rate | 39.2 GTexel/s | vs | 3.8 GTexel/s | More than 10.2x higher texture rate | |||
| Much higher memory clock speed | 1,010 MHz | vs | 400 MHz | More than 2.5x higher memory clock speed | |||
| More texture mapping units | 56 | vs | 8 | 48 more texture mapping units | |||
| Significantly wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 64 bit | 4x wider memory bus | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 11.2 GPixel/s | vs | 1.9 GPixel/s | Around 6x higher pixel rate | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 4 | 12 more render output processors | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly lower TDP | 31W | vs | 125W | 4x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 8800 vs 210
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
Features Key features of the GeForce GT 8800 vs 210
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| Radeon HD 5450 vs GeForce 210 | ||
 | VS | |
| $54 | ||
| GeForce GT 710 vs 210 | ||
 | VS | |
| $54 | ||
| GeForce 8400 GS vs 210 | ||
 | VS | |
| $55 | $54 | |
| GeForce GT 610 vs 210 | ||
 | VS | |
| $54 | ||
| GeForce GT 9500 vs 210 | ||
 | VS | |
| $54 | ||
| GeForce GT 9800 vs 210 | ||
 | VS | |
| $98 | $54 | |
| GeForce GT 730 vs 210 | ||
