Winner
ASUS GeForce GT 8800
GPUBoss recommends the ASUS GeForce GT 8800 based on its benchmarks.
See full details GeForce GT 8800 vs 520M |
Released February, 2008
ASUS GeForce GT 8800
- 700 MHz
- 512 MB GDDR3
6 Out of 10
by Anthony-Garreffa (Sep, 2012)If the chart is right, the HD 8870 could begin offering performance close to that of today's high-end offerings, which would really shake up the market.
VS
Released January, 2011
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M
- 672 MHz
- 1 GB DDR3
5.7 Out of 10
by Syed-Muhammad-Usman-Pirzada (Oct, 2013)Wow, #AsRock and #BMW DesignWorks USA’s #M8 Gaming Machine is a beauty.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 8800 vs 520M among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 64.6 GB/s | vs | 12.8 GB/s | More than 5x higher memory bandwidth | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More texture mapping units | 56 | vs | 8 | 48 more texture mapping units | |||
| Higher texture rate | 39.2 GTexel/s | vs | 5.38 GTexel/s | More than 7.2x higher texture rate | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 11.2 GPixel/s | vs | 1.34 GPixel/s | More than 8.2x higher pixel rate | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 4 | 12 more render output processors | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,010 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | More than 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 64 bit | 4x wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly lower TDP | 12W | vs | 125W | 10.4x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 8800 vs 520M
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
Features Key features of the GeForce GT 8800 vs 520M
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $55 | ||
| 8800 vs 610 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $98 | ||
| 8800 vs 730 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | ||
| 8800 vs 630 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| 8800 vs 210 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 8800 vs 710 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 8800 vs 920M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 8800 vs 750 Ti | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $279 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $279 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $279 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
