GeForce GT 8800 vs 730 |
Released February, 2008
ASUS GeForce GT 8800
- 700 MHz
- 512 MB GDDR3
by Anthony-Garreffa (Sep, 2012)If the chart is right, the HD 8870 could begin offering performance close to that of today's high-end offerings, which would really shake up the market.
VS
Expected June, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
- 902 MHz
- 1 GB GDDR5
by Anthony-Garreffa (Jan, 2013)NVIDIA are now listing something called the "GeForce Performance Score" which is used to define the performance of a part relative to Intel's HD4000 iGPU.
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 64.6 GB/s | vs | 40.1 GB/s | More than 60% higher memory bandwidth | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher texture rate | 39.2 GTexel/s | vs | 14.43 GTexel/s | Around 2.8x higher texture rate | |||
| More texture mapping units | 56 | vs | 16 | 40 more texture mapping units | |||
| Significantly wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 64 bit | 4x wider memory bus | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 5,012 MHz | vs | 2,020 MHz | Around 2.5x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher clock speed | 902 MHz | vs | 700 MHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,253 MHz | vs | 1,010 MHz | Around 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
| More shading units | 384 | vs | 112 | 272 more shading units | |||
| Significantly lower TDP | 38W | vs | 125W | 3.3x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 8800 vs 730
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
Features Key features of the GeForce GT 8800 vs 730
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $98 | ||
| 730 vs R7 240 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $98 | ||
| 730 vs 650 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $98 | ||
| 730 vs 710 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $98 | ||
| 730 vs 1030 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $98 | ||
| 730 vs 550 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $98 | ||
| 730 vs R7 250 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $98 | $200 | |
| 730 vs 660 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1080 Ti vs RTX 2080 Rev. A | ||
 | VS |  |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $291 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $291 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1080 Ti vs RTX 2080 | ||
 | VS | |
| $291 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
