Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GT 9400

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 9400

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 9400 GT Rev. 2 vs the 320 OEM.

Front view of GeForce GT 320

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 320

Report a correction
Higher effective memory clock speed 1,580 MHz vs 800 MHz Around 2x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher memory clock speed 790 MHz vs 400 MHz Around 2x higher memory clock speed
More texture mapping units 24 vs 8 Three times as many texture mapping units

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 9400 vs 320

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

Features Key features of the GeForce GT 9400  vs 320 

memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory

GeForce GT 9400
12.8 GB/s
GeForce GT 320
25.28 GB/s

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce GT 9400
2.2 GPixel/s
GeForce GT 320
4.32 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

GeForce GT 9400
4.4 GTexel/s
GeForce GT 320
12.96 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

GeForce GT 9400
44.8 GFLOPS
GeForce GT 320
187.5 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus