GeForce GT 9400 vs 320M |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Slightly higher clock speed | 550 MHz | vs | 500 MHz | 10% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 1,580 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | Around 2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 790 MHz | vs | 400 MHz | Around 2x higher memory clock speed | |||
| Lower TDP | 23W | vs | 50W | 2.2x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 9400 vs 320M
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
Features Key features of the GeForce GT 9400 vs 320M
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| 210 vs 9400 | ||
 | VS | |
| 5450 vs 9400 | ||
 | VS | |
| 220 vs 9400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $55 | ||
| 610 vs 9400 | ||
 | VS | |
| 9500 vs 9400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $98 | ||
| 730 vs 9400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | ||
| 630 vs 9400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
