GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 9500 vs 130M among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.1

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GT 130M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 130M  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GT 9500

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 9500

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 9500 GT vs the 130M.

Front view of GeForce GT 130M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 130M

Report a correction
Lower TDP 23W vs 50W 2.2x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 9500 vs 130M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

Features Key features of the GeForce GT 9500  vs 130M 

memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory

GeForce GT 9500
25.6 GB/s
GeForce GT 130M
25.6 GB/s

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce GT 9500
11.2 GPixel/s
GeForce GT 130M
12 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

GeForce GT 9500
22.4 GTexel/s
GeForce GT 130M
24 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

GeForce GT 9500
89.6 GFLOPS
GeForce GT 130M
96 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

Comments

comments powered by Disqus