Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GT 9600

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 9600

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 650 MHz vs 450 MHz Around 45% higher clock speed
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
Front view of GeForce 320M Mac

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 320M Mac

Report a correction
Lower TDP 23W vs 95W 4.1x lower TDP

Features Key features of the GeForce GT 9600  vs 320M Mac 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce GT 9600
10.4 GPixel/s
GeForce 320M Mac
3.6 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

GeForce GT 9600
20.8 GTexel/s
GeForce 320M Mac
7.2 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

GeForce GT 9600
GeForce 320M Mac

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs


GeForce GT 9600  vs
320M Mac 
GPU brand Nvidia Nvidia
GPU name G94 MCP89
Clock speed 650 MHz 450 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

noise and power

TDP 95W 23W

raw performance

GeForce GT 9600  vs
320M Mac 
Shading units 64 48
Texture mapping units 32 16
Render output processors 16 8
Pixel rate 10.4 GPixel/s 3.6 GPixel/s
Texture rate 20.8 GTexel/s 7.2 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 208 GFLOPS 91.2 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus