Winner
Nvidia GeForce 210
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce 210 based on its noise and power.
See full details GeForce GT 9800 vs 210 |
Released July, 2008
Nvidia GeForce GT 9800
- 600 MHz
- 512 MB GDDR3
6.2 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Jul, 2008)Both overclocks are quite nice, considering that this is an already pre-overclocked product.
VS
Released September, 2009
Nvidia GeForce 210
- 475 MHz
- 1 GB DDR2
6.1 Out of 10
by Usman-Pirzada (Jul, 2013)This 3W is equal to Intel’s SDP calculation which for the Haswell Fanless SoC is 4.5W. The GX-210JA will support an impressive 1Ghz Clock Speed.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 9800 vs 210 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.2 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | vs | 6.4 GB/s | 9x higher memory bandwidth | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 1,800 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | 2.2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher clock speed | 600 MHz | vs | 475 MHz | More than 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Much better cloud gate factor score | 10.06 | vs | 3.15 | Around 3.2x better cloud gate factor score | |||
| Slightly better PassMark score | 716 | vs | 177 | More than 4x better PassMark score | |||
| Higher texture rate | 33.6 GTexel/s | vs | 3.8 GTexel/s | More than 8.8x higher texture rate | |||
| More texture mapping units | 56 | vs | 8 | 48 more texture mapping units | |||
| Much wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 64 bit | 4x wider memory bus | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 900 MHz | vs | 400 MHz | 2.2x higher memory clock speed | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 4 | 12 more render output processors | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 9.6 GPixel/s | vs | 1.9 GPixel/s | More than 5x higher pixel rate | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly lower TDP | 31W | vs | 125W | 4x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 9800 vs 210
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Bioshock Infinite
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| GeForce 210 vs GT 710 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| GeForce 210 vs Radeon HD 5450 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| GeForce 210 vs GT 9500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| GeForce 210 vs 8400 GS | ||
 | VS |  |
| $98 | ||
| GeForce GT 9800 vs 730 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | ||
| GeForce GT 9800 vs 630 | ||
| | VS |  |
| GeForce GT 9800 vs GTX 550 Ti | ||
