0 Comments
| GeForce GT 9800 vs 240 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Slightly higher texture rate | 33.6 GTexel/s | vs | 17.6 GTexel/s | More than 90% higher texture rate | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
More texture mapping units | 56 | vs | 32 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 3,400 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | Around 90% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Lower TDP | 69W | vs | 125W | Around 45% lower TDP |
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 9800 vs 240
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
GeForce GT 9800
716
GeForce GT 240
652
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GT 9800
3,356.74
GeForce GT 240
3,688.23
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
GeForce GT 9800
10.06
GeForce GT 240
9.37