GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 9800 vs 630M among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.1

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GT 9800 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 9800  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GT 9800

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 9800

Report a correction
More texture mapping units 56 vs 16 40 more texture mapping units
More render output processors 16 vs 4 12 more render output processors
Better cloud gate factor score 10.06 vs 7.71 More than 30% better cloud gate factor score
Better T-Rex score 3,356.74 vs 2,994.54 More than 10% better T-Rex score
Higher battlefield 3 framerate 19 vs 8.3 More than 2.2x higher battlefield 3 framerate
Slightly wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
Front view of GeForce GT 630M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 630M

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 800 MHz vs 600 MHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 3,600 MHz vs 1,800 MHz 2x higher effective memory clock speed
More memory 2,048 MB vs 512 MB 4x more memory
Lower TDP 33W vs 125W 3.8x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 9800 vs 630M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 9800
3,356.74
GeForce GT 630M
2,994.54

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Bioshock Infinite

Battlefield 3

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus