GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of GTS 240 vs 435M among all GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

Nvidia GeForce GTS 240 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTS 240  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTS 240

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTS 240

Report a correction
Higher memory bandwidth 70.4 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s 2.8x higher memory bandwidth
Slightly higher effective memory clock speed 2,200 MHz vs 1,600 MHz Around 40% higher effective memory clock speed
More texture mapping units 56 vs 16 40 more texture mapping units
Higher texture rate 37.8 GTexel/s vs 10.4 GTexel/s Around 3.8x higher texture rate
More render output processors 16 vs 4 12 more render output processors
Slightly higher pixel rate 10.8 GPixel/s vs 2.6 GPixel/s Around 4.2x higher pixel rate
Higher memory clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 800 MHz Around 40% higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce GT 435M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 435M

Report a correction
Slightly more memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Lower TDP 35W vs 120W 3.4x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTS 240 vs GT 435M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Read more


comments powered by Disqus