GeForce GTS 250 vs GT 530 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GT 530GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s | vs | 28.8 GB/s | More than 2.5x higher memory bandwidth | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher texture rate | 48 GTexel/s | vs | 11.2 GTexel/s | More than 4.2x higher texture rate | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 2,300 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | Around 30% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 16 | 48 more texture mapping units | |||
| Better sky diver factor score | 132.04 | vs | 65.37 | More than 2x better sky diver factor score | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 12 GPixel/s | vs | 2.8 GPixel/s | More than 4.2x higher pixel rate | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 4 | 12 more render output processors | |||
| Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,150 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | Around 30% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly lower TDP | 50W | vs | 150W | 3x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTS 250 vs GT 530
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Follow us
Compare
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 6990 vs 580 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 570 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 380 vs RX 570 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 980 Ti vs 1060 9Gbps | ||
 | VS |  |
| 5870 Mac vs Pro 455 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 5450 vs R7 350 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 440 vs 240M LE | ||
