GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of GTS 250 vs 9800 among Desktop GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTS 250

Reasons to consider the
ZOTAC GeForce GTS 250

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 750 MHz vs 600 MHz 25% higher clock speed
Much higher battlefield 3 framerate 49 vs 19 More than 2.5x higher battlefield 3 framerate
Higher effective memory clock speed 2,300 MHz vs 1,800 MHz Around 30% higher effective memory clock speed
Slightly higher memory bandwidth 73.6 GB/s vs 57.6 GB/s Around 30% higher memory bandwidth
Slightly higher texture rate 48 GTexel/s vs 33.6 GTexel/s Around 45% higher texture rate
Higher memory clock speed 1,150 MHz vs 900 MHz Around 30% higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce GT 9800

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 9800

Report a correction
Lower TDP 125W vs 150W More than 15% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTS 250 vs GT 9800

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTS 250
GeForce GT 9800

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Reviews Word on the street


comments powered by Disqus