Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTS 250M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250M

Report a correction
Higher effective memory clock speed 3,200 MHz vs 1,600 MHz 2x higher effective memory clock speed
Much better T-Rex score 3,354.5 vs 1,760.08 More than 90% better T-Rex score
Higher memory bandwidth 51.2 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s 2x higher memory bandwidth
Higher texture rate 40 GTexel/s vs 19.36 GTexel/s More than 2x higher texture rate
More texture mapping units 32 vs 16 Twice as many texture mapping units
Front view of GeForce GT 240M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 240M

Report a correction
Slightly higher clock speed 550 MHz vs 500 MHz 10% higher clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTS 250M vs GT 240M

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Features Key features of the GeForce GTS 250M  vs GT 240M 

memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory

GeForce GTS 250M
51.2 GB/s
GeForce GT 240M
25.6 GB/s

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce GTS 250M
10 GPixel/s
GeForce GT 240M
9.68 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

GeForce GTS 250M
40 GTexel/s
GeForce GT 240M
19.36 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

GeForce GTS 250M
240 GFLOPS
GeForce GT 240M
116.2 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

Comments

comments powered by Disqus