Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTS 250M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250M

Report a correction
Higher effective memory clock speed 3,200 MHz vs 1,800 MHz Around 80% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher texture rate 40 GTexel/s vs 9.6 GTexel/s Around 4.2x higher texture rate
Higher memory bandwidth 51.2 GB/s vs 28.8 GB/s Around 80% higher memory bandwidth
Higher pixel rate 10 GPixel/s vs 2.4 GPixel/s Around 4.2x higher pixel rate
Better T-Rex score 3,359.1 vs 3,008.46 More than 10% better T-Rex score
More texture mapping units 32 vs 16 Twice as many texture mapping units
Front view of GeForce GT 525M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 525M

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 600 MHz vs 500 MHz 20% higher clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 900 MHz vs 800 MHz Around 15% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTS 250M vs GT 525M

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Features Key features of the GeForce GTS 250M  vs GT 525M 

memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory

GeForce GTS 250M
51.2 GB/s
GeForce GT 525M
28.8 GB/s

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce GTS 250M
10 GPixel/s
GeForce GT 525M
2.4 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

GeForce GTS 250M
40 GTexel/s
GeForce GT 525M
9.6 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

GeForce GTS 250M
240 GFLOPS
GeForce GT 525M
230.4 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

Comments

comments powered by Disqus