GeForce GTS 450 vs GT 610 |
Released March, 2011
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
- 783 MHz
- 1 GB GDDR5
5.8 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Sep, 2010)It also puzzles me why NVIDIA's reference design comes at such low clocks that almost every board partner would be out of his mind to not overclock and ask a premium for the boards.
VS
Released May, 2012
ASUS GeForce GT 610
- 810 MHz
- 2 GB DDR3
5.4 Out of 10
by Ryan-Smith (May, 2012)With 96 CUDA cores we’re not 100% sure that this is GF108 as opposed to the 28nm GK117, but as NVIDIA currently has a 28nm capacity bottleneck we can’t see them placing valuable 28nm chips in low-end retail cards.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of GTS 450 vs 610
Gaming | |
Real world tests using the latest 3D games | |
| crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 6 more | |
Benchmarks | |
Synthetic tests to measure overall performance | |
| Passmark | |
Compute Performance | |
General computing tests executed on the GPU | |
| Passmark Direct Compute | |
Noise and Power | |
How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load | |
| TDP | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 3,608 MHz | vs | 1,200 MHz | More than 3x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better passmark score | 1,539 | vs | 348 | Around 4.5x better passmark score | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 57.7 GB/s | vs | 9.6 GB/s | More than 6x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Slightly better floating-point performance | 601.3 GFLOPS | vs | 155.5 GFLOPS | More than 3.8x better floating-point performance | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 4 | 12 more render output processors | |||
| Higher texture rate | 25.1 GTexel/s | vs | 6.48 GTexel/s | More than 3.8x higher texture rate | |||
| Slightly higher pixel rate | 6.26 GPixel/s | vs | 1.62 GPixel/s | More than 3.8x higher pixel rate | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 902 MHz | vs | 600 MHz | More than 50% higher memory clock speed | |||
| More texture mapping units | 32 | vs | 8 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
| Wider memory bus | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| Better passmark direct compute score | 709 | vs | 198 | More than 3.5x better passmark direct compute score | |||
| |||||||
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Lower TDP | 29W | vs | 106W | 3.7x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTS 450 vs GT 610
Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance
Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $55 | ||
| GeForce 210 vs GT 610 | ||
 | VS | |
| $55 | ||
| Radeon HD 6450 vs GeForce GT 610 | ||
 | VS | |
| $55 | ||
| Radeon HD 5450 vs GeForce GT 610 | ||
 | VS | |
| $55 | ||
| GeForce GT 630 vs 610 | ||
 | VS | |
| $55 | ||
| GeForce GT 8800 vs 610 | ||
 | VS | |
| $55 | ||
| GeForce 8400 GS vs GT 610 | ||
| | VS |  |
| GeForce GT 630 vs GTS 450 | ||
