Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1,291 MHz vs 450 MHz More than 2.8x higher clock speed
Significantly higher pixel rate 41.3 GPixel/s vs 1.8 GPixel/s Around 23x higher pixel rate
Better floating-point performance 1,983 GFLOPS vs 17.6 GFLOPS Around 112.8x better floating-point performance
Significantly more render output processors 32 vs 4 28 more render output processors
Higher texture rate 62 GTexel/s vs 3.6 GTexel/s Around 17.2x higher texture rate
More shading units 768 vs 8 760 more shading units
More texture mapping units 48 vs 8 40 more texture mapping units
Front view of GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel

Reasons to consider the
Intel GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel

Report a correction
Lower TDP 12W vs 75W 6.2x lower TDP

Features Key features of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti  vs 9100M G mGPU Intel 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
41.3 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs


GeForce GTX 1050 Ti  vs
9100M G mGPU Intel 
GPU brand Nvidia Nvidia
GPU name GP107 MCP79MX
Clock speed 1,291 MHz 450 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

noise and power

TDP 75W 12W

raw performance

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti  vs
9100M G mGPU Intel 
Shading units 768 8
Texture mapping units 48 8
Render output processors 32 4
Pixel rate 41.3 GPixel/s 1.8 GPixel/s
Texture rate 62 GTexel/s 3.6 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 1,983 GFLOPS 17.6 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus