Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti based on its benchmarks.
See full details GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 930A |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1050 Ti vs 930A among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better PassMark score | 5,757 | vs | 1,152 | Around 5x better PassMark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 7,008 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | Around 4x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,291 MHz | vs | 928 MHz | Around 40% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s | vs | 14.4 GB/s | More than 7.8x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 41.3 GPixel/s | vs | 7.42 GPixel/s | More than 5.5x higher pixel rate | |||
| More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 1,392 MHz | vs | 941 MHz | Around 50% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,983 GFLOPS | vs | 712.7 GFLOPS | More than 2.8x better floating-point performance | |||
| Much higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | Around 95% higher memory clock speed | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 8 | 24 more render output processors | |||
| Higher texture rate | 62 GTexel/s | vs | 22.27 GTexel/s | More than 2.8x higher texture rate | |||
| More shading units | 768 | vs | 384 | Twice as many shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 48 | vs | 24 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 33W | vs | 75W | 2.3x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 930A
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| RX 570 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| RX 470 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| RX 560 vs 1050 Ti | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 390 vs 970 | ||
