Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GT 530 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1050 Ti vs 530 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 1,291 MHz | vs | 700 MHz | Around 85% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly better PassMark score | 5,757 | vs | 743 | Around 7.8x better PassMark score | |||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 7,008 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | Around 4x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 4x more memory | |||
| Significantly higher pixel rate | 41.3 GPixel/s | vs | 2.8 GPixel/s | 14.8x higher pixel rate | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s | vs | 28.8 GB/s | Around 4x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Much better fire strike factor score | 51.07 | vs | 7.67 | Around 6.8x better fire strike factor score | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,983 GFLOPS | vs | 268.8 GFLOPS | Around 7.5x better floating-point performance | |||
| Significantly more render output processors | 32 | vs | 4 | 28 more render output processors | |||
| Significantly better video composition score | 75.17 frames/s | vs | 9.45 frames/s | Around 8x better video composition score | |||
| Much higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | Around 95% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Higher texture rate | 62 GTexel/s | vs | 11.2 GTexel/s | More than 5.5x higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly better PassMark direct compute score | 3,271 | vs | 367 | Around 9x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| More shading units | 768 | vs | 96 | 672 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 48 | vs | 16 | Three times as many texture mapping units | |||
| Better manhattan score | 3,721.86 | vs | 1,704.19 | Around 2.2x better manhattan score | |||
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 50W | vs | 75W | Around 35% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GT 530
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 1050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs RX 570 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs RX 470 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs RX 560 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
