GeForce GTX 1050 vs 940MX

Released October, 2016

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

1.4 GHz
2 GB GDDR5

Front view of GeForce GTX 1050

6.8 Out of 10

NVIDIA's impressive Pascal architecture has some nice tricks under its 16nm FinFET hood, but the Twin Frozr VI cooler is 40% quieter than its predecessor (the Twin Frozr V), and it also keeps the card 20% cooler.

by www.tweaktown.com (Oct, 2016)

VS

older Released January, 2016

Nvidia GeForce 940MX

1.1 GHz
2 GB DDR3

Front view of GeForce 940MX

6.2 Out of 10

Performance figures a re not known but it is mentioned that the MX100 SSDs will feature very competitive price points which is a good sign in the SSD market since costs are going down and SSDs become the choice for storage globally due to the attractive prices.

by hassan-mujtaba (May, 2014)

	Gaming

GeForce GTX 1050 6.7 GeForce 940MX 5.3 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 6.9
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

	Graphics

GeForce GTX 1050 6.2 GeForce 940MX 5.7 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 6.3
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

	Computing

GeForce GTX 1050 6.3 GeForce 940MX 5.7 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 6.5
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

	Performance per Watt

GeForce GTX 1050 7.8 GeForce 940MX 7.5 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 7.9
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

	Noise and Power

GeForce GTX 1050 9.4 GeForce 940MX 9.9 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 9.4
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.8	Overall Score

GeForce GTX 1050 6.8 GeForce 940MX 6.2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 7.0

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

VS

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Nvidia GeForce 940MX

Join the discussion

Front view of GeForce GTX 1050

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Report a correction

Much higher effective memory clock speed

7,008 MHz

vs

2,002 MHz

More than 3.5x higher effective memory clock speed

Better PassMark score

4,443

vs

1,225

Around 3.8x better PassMark score

Higher clock speed

1,354 MHz

vs

1,122 MHz

More than 20% higher clock speed

Higher memory bandwidth

112.1 GB/s

vs

16.02 GB/s

Around 7x higher memory bandwidth

Higher pixel rate

46.56 GPixel/s

vs

8.98 GPixel/s

Around 5.2x higher pixel rate

Better floating-point performance

1,862 GFLOPS

vs

861.7 GFLOPS

Around 2.2x better floating-point performance

More render output processors

32

vs

8

24 more render output processors

Significantly better fire strike factor score

41.35

vs

13.57

More than 3x better fire strike factor score

Significantly higher memory clock speed

1,752 MHz

vs

1,001 MHz

More than 75% higher memory clock speed

Higher texture rate

58.2 GTexel/s

vs

26.93 GTexel/s

Around 2.2x higher texture rate

Higher turbo clock speed

1,455 MHz

vs

1,242 MHz

More than 15% higher turbo clock speed

Higher metro: last light framerate

44.5

vs

11.6

More than 3.8x higher metro: last light framerate

Better PassMark direct compute score

2,863

vs

912

Around 3.2x better PassMark direct compute score

Front view of GeForce 940MX

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 940MX

Report a correction

Better T-Rex score

2.04 frames/s

vs

0.42 frames/s

Around 5x better T-Rex score

Lower TDP

23W

vs

75W

3.3x lower TDP

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 1050

212.5 mHash/s

103.76 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 1050

80.61 mPixels/s

30.06 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 1050

3,357.2

3,357.58

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 1050

3,711.86

3,681.82

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

GeForce GTX 1050

41.35

13.57

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

GeForce GTX 1050

303.85

169.65

Battlefield 4

GeForce GTX 1050

54

11.9

Bioshock Infinite

GeForce GTX 1050

71.6

15.3

VS

1050 vs 1050 Ti

VS

940MX vs 950M

Comments

comments powered by Disqus