Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 1050 vs 940MX |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1050 vs 940MX among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.8 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050GPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 7,008 MHz | vs | 2,002 MHz | More than 3.5x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better PassMark score | 4,443 | vs | 1,225 | Around 3.8x better PassMark score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1,354 MHz | vs | 1,122 MHz | More than 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s | vs | 16.02 GB/s | Around 7x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Significantly higher pixel rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | vs | 8.98 GPixel/s | Around 5.2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Significantly better fire strike factor score | 41.35 | vs | 13.57 | More than 3x better fire strike factor score | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 8 | 24 more render output processors | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,862 GFLOPS | vs | 861.7 GFLOPS | Around 2.2x better floating-point performance | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 1,001 MHz | More than 75% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,455 MHz | vs | 1,242 MHz | More than 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher texture rate | 58.2 GTexel/s | vs | 26.93 GTexel/s | Around 2.2x higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly better PassMark direct compute score | 2,863 | vs | 912 | Around 3.2x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Higher metro: last light framerate | 44.5 | vs | 11.6 | More than 3.8x higher metro: last light framerate | |||
| Better T-Rex score | 4.45 frames/s | vs | 1.85 frames/s | Around 2.5x better T-Rex score | |||
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 23W | vs | 75W | 3.3x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 1050 vs 940MX
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Battlefield 4
Bioshock Infinite
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs RX 460 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs RX 560 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs 970 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 940MX vs 950M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
