Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 1050 vs 940MX |
Released October, 2016
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
- 1.4 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
6.9 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (Oct, 2016)NVIDIA's impressive Pascal architecture has some nice tricks under its 16nm FinFET hood, but the Twin Frozr VI cooler is 40% quieter than its predecessor (the Twin Frozr V), and it also keeps the card 20% cooler.
VS
Released January, 2016
Nvidia GeForce 940MX
- 1.1 GHz
- 2 GB DDR3
6.1 Out of 10
by hassan-mujtaba (May, 2014)Performance figures a re not known but it is mentioned that the MX100 SSDs will feature very competitive price points which is a good sign in the SSD market since costs are going down and SSDs become the choice for storage globally due to the attractive prices.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1050 vs 940MX among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.9 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 7,008 MHz | vs | 2,002 MHz | More than 3.5x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better PassMark score | 4,443 | vs | 1,225 | Around 3.8x better PassMark score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1,354 MHz | vs | 1,122 MHz | More than 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s | vs | 16.02 GB/s | Around 7x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Significantly higher pixel rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | vs | 8.98 GPixel/s | Around 5.2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Significantly better fire strike factor score | 41.35 | vs | 13.57 | More than 3x better fire strike factor score | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 8 | 24 more render output processors | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,862 GFLOPS | vs | 861.7 GFLOPS | Around 2.2x better floating-point performance | |||
| Much higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 1,001 MHz | More than 75% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better video composition score | 70.53 frames/s | vs | 28.08 frames/s | More than 2.5x better video composition score | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,455 MHz | vs | 1,242 MHz | More than 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher texture rate | 58.2 GTexel/s | vs | 26.93 GTexel/s | Around 2.2x higher texture rate | |||
| Higher metro: last light framerate | 44.5 | vs | 11.6 | More than 3.8x higher metro: last light framerate | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 2,863 | vs | 912 | Around 3.2x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 23W | vs | 75W | 3.3x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 1050 vs 940MX
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Battlefield 4
Bioshock Infinite
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs RX 560 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs RX 550 | ||
 | VS | |
| 940MX vs MX150 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1080 vs RTX 2070 | ||
 | VS | |
| 1080 Ti vs RTX 2070 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $288 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS | |
| $288 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
 | VS | |
| $288 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
