GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1050 vs G102M among all GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050  based on its benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 1050

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1,354 MHz vs 450 MHz More than 3x higher clock speed
Significantly better PassMark score 4,443 vs 97 More than 45.8x better PassMark score
Significantly higher pixel rate 46.56 GPixel/s vs 1.8 GPixel/s More than 25.8x higher pixel rate
Better floating-point performance 1,862 GFLOPS vs 35.2 GFLOPS Around 53x better floating-point performance
Significantly more render output processors 32 vs 4 28 more render output processors
Higher texture rate 58.2 GTexel/s vs 3.6 GTexel/s Around 16.2x higher texture rate
More shading units 640 vs 16 624 more shading units
More texture mapping units 40 vs 8 32 more texture mapping units
Slightly better T-Rex score 3,357.16 vs 890.85 More than 3.8x better T-Rex score
Front view of GeForce G102M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce G102M

Report a correction
Lower TDP 14W vs 75W 5.4x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 1050 vs G102M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Read more


comments powered by Disqus