Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 1050 vs GT 1030 |
Released October, 2016
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
- 1.4 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
6.8 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (Oct, 2016)NVIDIA's impressive Pascal architecture has some nice tricks under its 16nm FinFET hood, but the Twin Frozr VI cooler is 40% quieter than its predecessor (the Twin Frozr V), and it also keeps the card 20% cooler.
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1050 vs 1030 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.8 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Better PassMark score | 4,443 | vs | 2,256 | More than 95% better PassMark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s | vs | 48.06 GB/s | More than 2.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1,354 MHz | vs | 1,227 MHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | vs | 11.74 GPixel/s | Around 4x higher pixel rate | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,008 MHz | vs | 6,008 MHz | More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 8 | 24 more render output processors | |||
| Slightly better floating-point performance | 1,862 GFLOPS | vs | 1,127 GFLOPS | More than 65% better floating-point performance | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 41.35 | vs | 27.03 | Around 55% better fire strike factor score | |||
| Slightly higher texture rate | 58.2 GTexel/s | vs | 35.23 GTexel/s | More than 65% higher texture rate | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 1,502 MHz | More than 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 2,863 | vs | 1,617 | More than 75% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Slightly more shading units | 640 | vs | 384 | 256 more shading units | |||
| Slightly more texture mapping units | 40 | vs | 24 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
| |||||||
| Better T-Rex score | 2.37 frames/s | vs | 0.42 frames/s | Around 5.8x better T-Rex score | |||
| Lower TDP | 30W | vs | 75W | 2.5x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 1050 vs GT 1030
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
