Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details | GeForce GTX 1050 vs GT 1030 |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
6.7 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050GPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
| |||||||
Better PassMark score | 4,443 | vs | 2,256 | More than 95% better PassMark score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 1,354 MHz | vs | 1,227 MHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
Higher pixel rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | vs | 11.74 GPixel/s | Around 4x higher pixel rate | |||
Higher memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s | vs | 48.06 GB/s | More than 2.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,008 MHz | vs | 6,008 MHz | More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
More render output processors | 32 | vs | 8 | 24 more render output processors | |||
Slightly better floating-point performance | 1,862 GFLOPS | vs | 1,127 GFLOPS | More than 65% better floating-point performance | |||
Better fire strike factor score | 41.35 | vs | 27.03 | Around 55% better fire strike factor score | |||
Slightly higher texture rate | 58.2 GTexel/s | vs | 35.23 GTexel/s | More than 65% higher texture rate | |||
Better T-Rex score | 4.45 frames/s | vs | 2.42 frames/s | Around 85% better T-Rex score | |||
Better PassMark direct compute score | 2,863 | vs | 1,617 | More than 75% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 1,502 MHz | More than 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
Lower TDP | 30W | vs | 75W | 2.5x lower TDP |