GeForce GTX 1060 vs 205 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better PassMark score | 8,686 | vs | 126 | Around 69x better PassMark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher clock speed | 1,544 MHz | vs | 589 MHz | More than 2.5x higher clock speed | |||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 8,008 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | More than 10x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Much higher memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | vs | 6.4 GB/s | More than 30x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Much more memory | 6,144 MB | vs | 512 MB | 12x more memory | |||
| Much better floating-point performance | 3,953 GFLOPS | vs | 22.43 GFLOPS | Around 176.2x better floating-point performance | |||
| Much higher pixel rate | 74.1 GPixel/s | vs | 2.36 GPixel/s | Around 31.5x higher pixel rate | |||
| Much higher texture rate | 123.5 GTexel/s | vs | 2.36 GTexel/s | Around 52.5x higher texture rate | |||
| Much higher memory clock speed | 2,002 MHz | vs | 400 MHz | More than 5x higher memory clock speed | |||
| Many more render output processors | 48 | vs | 4 | 44 more render output processors | |||
| Significantly more shading units | 1,280 | vs | 8 | 1272 more shading units | |||
| Significantly more texture mapping units | 80 | vs | 4 | 76 more texture mapping units | |||
| Wider memory bus | 192 bit | vs | 64 bit | 3x wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly lower TDP | 31W | vs | 120W | 3.9x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 1060 vs 205
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
Features Key features of the GeForce GTX 1060 vs 205
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 480 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs 1070 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs 980 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 570 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
