GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1060 vs G102M among all GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

MSI GeForce GTX 1060 

GPUBoss recommends the MSI GeForce GTX 1060  based on its benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 1060

Reasons to consider the
MSI GeForce GTX 1060

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1,544 MHz vs 450 MHz Around 3.5x higher clock speed
Much better PassMark score 8,686 vs 97 More than 89.5x better PassMark score
Much higher pixel rate 74.1 GPixel/s vs 1.8 GPixel/s Around 41.2x higher pixel rate
Significantly better floating-point performance 3,953 GFLOPS vs 35.2 GFLOPS More than 112.2x better floating-point performance
Significantly higher texture rate 123.5 GTexel/s vs 3.6 GTexel/s More than 34.2x higher texture rate
Many more render output processors 48 vs 4 44 more render output processors
Significantly more shading units 1,280 vs 16 1264 more shading units
More texture mapping units 80 vs 8 72 more texture mapping units
Slightly better T-Rex score 3,358.86 vs 890.85 More than 3.8x better T-Rex score
Front view of GeForce G102M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce G102M

Report a correction
Significantly lower TDP 14W vs 120W 8.6x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 1060 vs G102M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Read more


comments powered by Disqus