GeForce GTX 1060 vs G210 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better PassMark score | 8,686 | vs | 173 | Around 50.2x better PassMark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher clock speed | 1,544 MHz | vs | 550 MHz | More than 2.8x higher clock speed | |||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 8,008 MHz | vs | 1,008 MHz | Around 8x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Much higher memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | vs | 8.06 GB/s | More than 23.8x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Much more memory | 6,144 MB | vs | 512 MB | 12x more memory | |||
| Much better floating-point performance | 3,953 GFLOPS | vs | 43.2 GFLOPS | More than 91.5x better floating-point performance | |||
| Much higher pixel rate | 74.1 GPixel/s | vs | 2.2 GPixel/s | Around 33.8x higher pixel rate | |||
| Much higher texture rate | 123.5 GTexel/s | vs | 4.4 GTexel/s | More than 28x higher texture rate | |||
| Much higher memory clock speed | 2,002 MHz | vs | 504 MHz | Around 4x higher memory clock speed | |||
| Many more render output processors | 48 | vs | 4 | 44 more render output processors | |||
| Significantly more shading units | 1,280 | vs | 16 | 1264 more shading units | |||
| Significantly more texture mapping units | 80 | vs | 8 | 72 more texture mapping units | |||
| Wider memory bus | 192 bit | vs | 64 bit | 3x wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly lower TDP | 31W | vs | 120W | 3.9x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 1060 vs G210
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
Features Key features of the GeForce GTX 1060 vs G210
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| RX 480 vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 1070 vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 980 vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 960 vs 1060 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 390 vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
