Winner
MSI GeForce GTX 1060
GPUBoss recommends the MSI GeForce GTX 1060 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 1060 vs 1050 Ti |
Released July, 2016
MSI GeForce GTX 1060
- 1.5 GHz
- 6 GB GDDR5
6.7 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (Jul, 2016)Performance (overclocking, power)90%Quality (build, design, cooling)85%General Features (display outputs, etc)95%Bundle, Packaging & Software90%Value for Money80% Overall TweakTown Rating88% The Bottom Line: NVIDIA crafts yet another great graphics card in the GeForce GTX 1060, with all of the benefits and features of Pascal in a 120W TDP package.
VS
Released October, 2016
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- 1.3 GHz
- 4 GB GDDR5
6.9 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (Oct, 2016)NVIDIA's impressive Pascal architecture has some nice tricks under its 16nm FinFET hood, but the Twin Frozr VI cooler is 40% quieter than its predecessor (the Twin Frozr V), and it also keeps the card 20% cooler.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1060 vs 1050 Ti among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.9 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
MSI GeForce GTX 1060GPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Better PassMark score | 8,686 | vs | 5,757 | More than 50% better PassMark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 1,544 MHz | vs | 1,291 MHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | vs | 112.1 GB/s | More than 70% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 74.1 GPixel/s | vs | 41.3 GPixel/s | Around 80% higher pixel rate | |||
| More memory | 6,144 MB | vs | 4,096 MB | 50% more memory | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 3,953 GFLOPS | vs | 1,983 GFLOPS | Around 2x better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 8,008 MHz | vs | 7,008 MHz | Around 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher texture rate | 123.5 GTexel/s | vs | 62 GTexel/s | Around 2x higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 1,759 MHz | vs | 1,392 MHz | More than 25% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| More render output processors | 48 | vs | 32 | 16 more render output processors | |||
| Better T-Rex score | 8.54 frames/s | vs | 5.05 frames/s | Around 70% better T-Rex score | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 5,049 | vs | 3,271 | Around 55% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| More shading units | 1,280 | vs | 768 | 512 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 80 | vs | 48 | 32 more texture mapping units | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 2,002 MHz | vs | 1,752 MHz | Around 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 75W | vs | 120W | Around 40% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 1060 vs 1050 Ti
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench
Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
Read more
Comments
Showing 10 comments.
