GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 260 vs 920M among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.2

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 260  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 260

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260

Report a correction
Higher memory bandwidth 112.9 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s More than 7.8x higher memory bandwidth
Better cloud gate factor score 13.11 vs 9.7 More than 35% better cloud gate factor score
More render output processors 28 vs 16 12 more render output processors
More texture mapping units 64 vs 32 Twice as many texture mapping units
Higher battlefield 4 framerate 40 vs 9.6 Around 4.2x higher battlefield 4 framerate
Wider memory bus 448 bit vs 64 bit 7x wider memory bus
Slightly higher memory clock speed 1,008 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 10% higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce 920M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 920M

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 954 MHz vs 518 MHz Around 85% higher clock speed
Better particle simulation score 161.39 mInteraction/s vs 26.34 mInteraction/s Around 6.2x better particle simulation score
Significantly lower TDP 33W vs 182W 5.5x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 260 vs 920M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 260
29.52 mHash/s
GeForce 920M
40.41 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 260
8.66 mPixels/s
GeForce 920M
8.36 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 260
477.33 frames/s
GeForce 920M
157.17 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 260
26.34 mInteraction/s
GeForce 920M
161.39 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 260
3,355.14
GeForce 920M
3,358.92

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Comments

comments powered by Disqus