GeForce GTX 260 vs 9300M G |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 112.9 GB/s | vs | 9.6 GB/s | More than 11.8x higher memory bandwidth | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 518 MHz | vs | 400 MHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
| More memory | 1,792 MB | vs | 256 MB | 7x more memory | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 2,016 MHz | vs | 1,200 MHz | Around 70% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| More render output processors | 28 | vs | 4 | 24 more render output processors | |||
| More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 8 | 56 more texture mapping units | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 14.5 GPixel/s | vs | 1.6 GPixel/s | More than 9x higher pixel rate | |||
| Higher texture rate | 33.15 GTexel/s | vs | 3.2 GTexel/s | More than 10.2x higher texture rate | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,008 MHz | vs | 600 MHz | Around 70% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Wider memory bus | 448 bit | vs | 64 bit | 7x wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
| Much lower TDP | 13W | vs | 182W | 14x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the GeForce GTX 260 vs 9300M G
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | GeForce GTX 260 | vs | 9300M G |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU brand | Nvidia | Nvidia | |
| GPU name | GT200B | G86 | |
| Market | Desktop | Laptop | |
| Clock speed | 518 MHz | 400 MHz | |
| Is dual GPU | No | No | |
| Reference card | Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 576 MHz 896 MB | None | |
raw performance | |||
| Shading units | 192 | 16 | |
| Texture mapping units | 64 | 8 | |
| Render output processors | 28 | 4 | |
| Pixel rate | 14.5 GPixel/s | 1.6 GPixel/s | |
| Texture rate | 33.15 GTexel/s | 3.2 GTexel/s | |
| Floating-point performance | 414.7 GFLOPS | 25.6 GFLOPS | |
memory | GeForce GTX 260 | vs | 9300M G |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory clock speed | 1,008 MHz | 600 MHz | |
| Effective memory clock speed | 2,016 MHz | 1,200 MHz | |
| Memory bus | 448 bit | 64 bit | |
| Memory | 1,792 MB | 256 MB | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.9 GB/s | 9.6 GB/s | |
noise and power | |||
| TDP | 182W | 13W | |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $98 | ||
| GeForce GT 730 vs GTX 260 | ||
 | VS | |
| GeForce GT 710 vs GTX 260 | ||
 | VS | |
| GeForce GT 9800 vs GTX 260 | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | ||
| GeForce GT 630 vs GTX 260 | ||
 | VS | |
| $55 | ||
| GeForce GT 610 vs GTX 260 | ||
 | VS | |
| GeForce 920M vs GTX 260 | ||
 | VS | |
| $54 | ||
| GeForce 210 vs GTX 260 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| Radeon RX 580 vs GeForce GTX 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
