GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 260 vs 610 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.2

Overall Score

Winner
ASUS GeForce GT 610 

GPUBoss recommends the ASUS GeForce GT 610  based on its noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 260

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260

Report a correction
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 112.9 GB/s vs 9.6 GB/s More than 11.8x higher memory bandwidth
Much better T-Rex score 3,355.14 vs 1,270.59 Around 2.8x better T-Rex score
Much better cloud gate factor score 13.11 vs 4.42 Around 3x better cloud gate factor score
Higher effective memory clock speed 2,016 MHz vs 1,200 MHz Around 70% higher effective memory clock speed
Much wider memory bus 448 bit vs 64 bit 7x wider memory bus
Significantly more render output processors 28 vs 4 24 more render output processors
Significantly more texture mapping units 64 vs 8 56 more texture mapping units
Higher pixel rate 14.5 GPixel/s vs 1.62 GPixel/s Around 9x higher pixel rate
Higher texture rate 33.15 GTexel/s vs 6.48 GTexel/s More than 5x higher texture rate
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,008 MHz vs 600 MHz Around 70% higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce GT 610

Reasons to consider the
ASUS GeForce GT 610

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 810 MHz vs 518 MHz More than 55% higher clock speed
Much lower TDP 29W vs 182W 6.3x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 260 vs GT 610

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 260
29.52 mHash/s
GeForce GT 610
4.05 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 260
8.66 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 610
2.47 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 260
477.33 frames/s
GeForce GT 610
79.36 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 260
26.34 mInteraction/s
GeForce GT 610
22.74 mInteraction/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 260
24.91 frames/s
GeForce GT 610
6.02 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 260
3,355.14
GeForce GT 610
1,270.59

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus