GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 260M vs 920M among Laptop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 260M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260M

Report a correction
Higher memory bandwidth 60.8 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s Around 4.2x higher memory bandwidth
Much wider memory bus 256 bit vs 64 bit 4x wider memory bus
More texture mapping units 56 vs 32 24 more texture mapping units
Front view of GeForce 920M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 920M

Report a correction
Much better T-Rex score 3,358.92 vs 2,690.48 Around 25% better T-Rex score
Significantly higher clock speed 954 MHz vs 550 MHz Around 75% higher clock speed
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
More shading units 384 vs 112 272 more shading units
Lower TDP 33W vs 65W Around 50% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 260M vs 920M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 260M
2,690.48
GeForce 920M
3,358.92

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus