GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 260M vs 635M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

Nvidia GeForce GT 635M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 635M  based on its benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 260M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260M

Report a correction
Much better T-Rex score 2,690.48 vs 2,471.91 Around 10% better T-Rex score
Higher memory bandwidth 60.8 GB/s vs 28.8 GB/s More than 2x higher memory bandwidth
Significantly wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
More texture mapping units 56 vs 24 32 more texture mapping units
Slightly higher texture rate 30.8 GTexel/s vs 16.2 GTexel/s More than 90% higher texture rate
Front view of GeForce GT 635M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 635M

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 675 MHz vs 550 MHz Around 25% higher clock speed
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Lower TDP 35W vs 65W More than 45% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 260M vs GT 635M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 260M
GeForce GT 635M

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark


comments powered by Disqus