GeForce GTX 260M vs GTS 260M |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More texture mapping units | 56 | vs | 32 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| |||||||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 3,600 MHz | vs | 1,900 MHz | Around 90% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Lower TDP | 38W | vs | 65W | More than 40% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the GeForce GTX 260M vs GTS 260M
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | GeForce GTX 260M | vs | GTS 260M |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU brand | Nvidia | Nvidia | |
| GPU name | G92 | GT215 | |
| Market | Laptop | Laptop | |
| Clock speed | 550 MHz | 550 MHz | |
| Is dual GPU | No | No | |
| Reference card | None | None | |
raw performance | |||
| Shading units | 112 | 96 | |
| Texture mapping units | 56 | 32 | |
| Render output processors | 16 | 8 | |
| Pixel rate | 8.8 GPixel/s | 4.4 GPixel/s | |
| Texture rate | 30.8 GTexel/s | 17.6 GTexel/s | |
| Floating-point performance | 308 GFLOPS | 264 GFLOPS | |
memory | GeForce GTX 260M | vs | GTS 260M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 900 MHz | |
| Effective memory clock speed | 1,900 MHz | 3,600 MHz | |
| Memory bus | 256 bit | 128 bit | |
| Memory | 1,024 MB | 1,024 MB | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 60.8 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s | |
noise and power | |||
| TDP | 65W | 38W | |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| Radeon RX 580 vs GeForce GTX 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
