Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 280M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 280M

Report a correction
Significantly wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
More texture mapping units 64 vs 32 Twice as many texture mapping units
Front view of GeForce GT 750M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 941 MHz vs 585 MHz More than 60% higher clock speed
Better PassMark score 1,288 vs 667 Around 95% better PassMark score
Higher effective memory clock speed 4,000 MHz vs 1,900 MHz More than 2x higher effective memory clock speed
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
More shading units 384 vs 128 Three times as many shading units
Lower TDP 50W vs 75W Around 35% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 280M vs GT 750M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

Features Key features of the GeForce GTX 280M  vs GT 750M 

memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory

GeForce GTX 280M
60.8 GB/s
GeForce GT 750M
64 GB/s

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce GTX 280M
9.36 GPixel/s
GeForce GT 750M
7.53 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

GeForce GTX 280M
37.44 GTexel/s
GeForce GT 750M
30.11 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

GeForce GTX 280M
374.5 GFLOPS
GeForce GT 750M
722.7 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus