0 Comments
| GeForce GTX 295 vs 285 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Is dual GPU | Yes | vs | No | About half of graphics cards are dual GPU | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | vs | 159 GB/s | More than 40% higher memory bandwidth | |||
Significantly more texture mapping units | 160 | vs | 80 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
Much wider memory bus | 896 bit | vs | 512 bit | 75% wider memory bus | |||
Higher texture rate | 92.16 GTexel/s | vs | 51.84 GTexel/s | Around 80% higher texture rate | |||
Significantly more render output processors | 56 | vs | 32 | 24 more render output processors | |||
Slightly more memory | 1,792 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 75% more memory | |||
Higher pixel rate | 32.26 GPixel/s | vs | 20.74 GPixel/s | More than 55% higher pixel rate | |||
Slightly better floating-point performance | 1,192.4 GFLOPS | vs | 708.5 GFLOPS | Around 70% better floating-point performance | |||
Better cloud gate factor score | 15.95 | vs | 13.51 | Around 20% better cloud gate factor score | |||
More shading units | 480 | vs | 240 | Twice as many shading units | |||
| |||||||
Slightly higher clock speed | 648 MHz | vs | 576 MHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 2,484 MHz | vs | 1,998 MHz | Around 25% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,242 MHz | vs | 999 MHz | Around 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
Significantly lower TDP | 204W | vs | 289W | Around 30% lower TDP |
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 295 vs 285
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
GeForce GTX 295
1,050
GeForce GTX 285
1,266
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 295
4,542.92
GeForce GTX 285
3,358.04
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
GeForce GTX 295
15.95
GeForce GTX 285
13.51
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 295 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
760 vs 295 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 295 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
4870 X2 vs 295 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 285 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
550 Ti vs 285 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
760 vs 285 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 390 vs 970 | ||