Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 295

Reasons to consider the
EVGA GeForce GTX 295

Report a correction
Is dual GPU Yes vs No About half of graphics cards are dual GPU
Higher memory bandwidth 223.8 GB/s vs 159 GB/s More than 40% higher memory bandwidth
Significantly more texture mapping units 160 vs 80 Twice as many texture mapping units
Much wider memory bus 896 bit vs 512 bit 75% wider memory bus
Higher texture rate 92.16 GTexel/s vs 51.84 GTexel/s Around 80% higher texture rate
Significantly more render output processors 56 vs 32 24 more render output processors
Slightly more memory 1,792 MB vs 1,024 MB 75% more memory
Higher pixel rate 32.26 GPixel/s vs 20.74 GPixel/s More than 55% higher pixel rate
Slightly better floating-point performance 1,192.4 GFLOPS vs 708.5 GFLOPS Around 70% better floating-point performance
Better cloud gate factor score 15.95 vs 13.51 Around 20% better cloud gate factor score
More shading units 480 vs 240 Twice as many shading units
Front view of GeForce GTX 285

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 285

Report a correction
Slightly higher clock speed 648 MHz vs 576 MHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 2,484 MHz vs 1,998 MHz Around 25% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 1,242 MHz vs 999 MHz Around 25% higher memory clock speed
Significantly lower TDP 204W vs 289W Around 30% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 295 vs 285

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 295
4,542.92
GeForce GTX 285
3,358.04

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus