GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 460 vs 820M among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.6

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 460  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 460

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460

Report a correction
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 115.2 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s 8x higher memory bandwidth
Higher effective memory clock speed 3,600 MHz vs 1,800 MHz 2x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly better sky diver factor score 184.62 vs 65.65 More than 2.8x better sky diver factor score
More render output processors 32 vs 8 24 more render output processors
Slightly better floating-point performance 907.2 GFLOPS vs 240 GFLOPS More than 3.8x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 37.8 GTexel/s vs 10 GTexel/s More than 3.8x higher texture rate
More texture mapping units 56 vs 16 40 more texture mapping units
Slightly better face detection score 20.75 mPixels/s vs 7.76 mPixels/s Around 2.8x better face detection score
Front view of GeForce 820M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 820M

Report a correction
Much lower TDP 15W vs 160W 10.7x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 460 vs 820M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 460
66.12 mHash/s
GeForce 820M
23.28 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 460
20.75 mPixels/s
GeForce 820M
7.76 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 460
734.23 frames/s
GeForce 820M
160.34 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 460
171.41 mInteraction/s
GeForce 820M
74.75 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 460
1.82 frames/s
GeForce 820M
0.7 frames/s

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus