Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 based on its .
See full details GeForce GTX 460 vs GT 520M |
Released July, 2010
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
- 675 MHz
- 1 GB GDDR5
6.5 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Aug, 2010)As mentioned before the overclock out of the box is great for novice users, but experienced overclockers may as well opt for a non-overclocked version and save some money.
VS
Released January, 2011
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M
- 672 MHz
- 1 GB DDR3
5.7 Out of 10
by Syed-Muhammad-Usman-Pirzada (Oct, 2013)Wow, #AsRock and #BMW DesignWorks USA’s #M8 Gaming Machine is a beauty.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 460 vs 520M among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.5 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | vs | 12.8 GB/s | 9x higher memory bandwidth | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 3,600 MHz | vs | 1,600 MHz | 2.2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly better sky diver factor score | 184.27 | vs | 42.96 | More than 4.2x better sky diver factor score | |||
| Significantly more render output processors | 32 | vs | 4 | 28 more render output processors | |||
| Slightly better floating-point performance | 907.2 GFLOPS | vs | 129.02 GFLOPS | More than 7x better floating-point performance | |||
| More texture mapping units | 56 | vs | 8 | 48 more texture mapping units | |||
| Higher texture rate | 37.8 GTexel/s | vs | 5.38 GTexel/s | More than 7x higher texture rate | |||
| Slightly higher pixel rate | 9.45 GPixel/s | vs | 1.34 GPixel/s | More than 7x higher pixel rate | |||
| Better particle simulation score | 171.41 mInteraction/s | vs | 25.04 mInteraction/s | More than 6.8x better particle simulation score | |||
| Slightly more shading units | 336 | vs | 48 | 288 more shading units | |||
| Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 64 bit | 4x wider memory bus | |||
| Slightly higher memory clock speed | 900 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | Around 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly lower TDP | 12W | vs | 160W | 13.3x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
