GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 460M vs 630M among Laptop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.8

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 460M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M

Report a correction
Much better T-Rex score 3,294.35 vs 2,994.54 More than 10% better T-Rex score
Much better 3DMark06 score 12,942 vs 1,051 More than 12.2x better 3DMark06 score
Better PassMark score 1,388 vs 678 More than 2x better PassMark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 6,709 vs 3,985 Around 70% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher memory bandwidth 60 GB/s vs 32 GB/s Around 90% higher memory bandwidth
More render output processors 24 vs 4 20 more render output processors
Wider memory bus 192 bit vs 128 bit 50% wider memory bus
More texture mapping units 32 vs 16 Twice as many texture mapping units
Better particle simulation score 105.02 mInteraction/s vs 57.64 mInteraction/s More than 80% better particle simulation score
Slightly better sky diver factor score 116.57 vs 60.47 Around 95% better sky diver factor score
Slightly better PassMark direct compute score 574 vs 373 Around 55% better PassMark direct compute score
Front view of GeForce GT 630M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 630M

Report a correction
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 8,610 vs 1,623 More than 5.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher clock speed 800 MHz vs 675 MHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 3,600 MHz vs 2,500 MHz Around 45% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 900 MHz vs 625 MHz Around 45% higher memory clock speed
Slightly lower TDP 33W vs 50W Around 35% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 460M vs GT 630M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 460M
32.96 mHash/s
GeForce GT 630M
20.98 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 460M
11.12 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 630M
5.06 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 460M
3,294.35
GeForce GT 630M
2,994.54

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 460M
2,688.05
GeForce GT 630M
2,068.17

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Crysis 2

Comments

comments powered by Disqus