GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 470 vs 610M among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

5.9

Overall Score

Winner
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 470 

GPUBoss recommends the GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 470  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 470

Reasons to consider the
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 470

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 22,622 vs 507.5 More than 44.5x better 3DMark06 score
Better PassMark score 3,607 vs 399 More than 9x better PassMark score
Much better CLBenchmark raytrace score 117,626 vs 9,976 More than 11.8x better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 15,350 vs 1,930 Around 8x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher memory bandwidth 133.9 GB/s vs 12.8 GB/s Around 10.5x higher memory bandwidth
Higher effective memory clock speed 3,348 MHz vs 1,600 MHz More than 2x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly more render output processors 40 vs 2 38 more render output processors
Higher pixel rate 19.6 GPixel/s vs 1.34 GPixel/s More than 14.5x higher pixel rate
Better floating-point performance 1,254 GFLOPS vs 129.02 GFLOPS Around 9.8x better floating-point performance
Better fire strike factor score 24.71 vs 4.91 More than 5x better fire strike factor score
Higher texture rate 39.2 GTexel/s vs 5.38 GTexel/s More than 7.2x higher texture rate
More texture mapping units 56 vs 8 48 more texture mapping units
Better face detection score 27.93 mPixels/s vs 2.75 mPixels/s Around 10.2x better face detection score
More shading units 448 vs 48 400 more shading units
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,340 vs 205 More than 6.5x better PassMark direct compute score
Wider memory bus 320 bit vs 64 bit 5x wider memory bus
Front view of GeForce 610M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 610M

Report a correction
Much lower TDP 12W vs 215W 17.9x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 470 vs 610M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 470
96.66 mHash/s
GeForce 610M
9.69 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 470
27.93 mPixels/s
GeForce 610M
2.75 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 470
979.97 frames/s
GeForce 610M
110.21 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 470
3,353.44
GeForce 610M
2,064.48

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 470
3,706.15
GeForce 610M
1,308.32

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus