Winner
Nvidia GeForce GT 1030
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs GT 1030 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 550 Ti vs 1030 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.4 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GT 1030GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 98.5 GB/s | vs | 48.06 GB/s | More than 2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More render output processors | 24 | vs | 8 | Three times as many render output processors | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,227 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 35% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 6,008 MHz | vs | 4,104 MHz | More than 45% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Slightly more memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 1,026 MHz | More than 45% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 27.03 | vs | 17.07 | Around 60% better fire strike factor score | |||
| Better T-Rex score | 2.42 frames/s | vs | 1.06 frames/s | More than 2.2x better T-Rex score | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,617 | vs | 822 | More than 95% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Lower TDP | 30W | vs | 116W | 3.9x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs GT 1030
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $98 | ||
| 1030 vs 730 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1030 vs RX 550 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| 1030 vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1030 vs 1050 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 550 Ti vs 650 | ||
| | VS | |
| $98 | ||
| 550 Ti vs 730 | ||
| | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 550 Ti vs 750 Ti | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 750 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs R9 380 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
