GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 550 Ti vs 445M among all GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 900 MHz vs 570 MHz Around 60% higher clock speed
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 15,553 vs 10,304 More than 50% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher effective memory clock speed 4,104 MHz vs 2,500 MHz Around 65% higher effective memory clock speed
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 9,923 vs 4,570 Around 2.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Slightly better PassMark score 1,926 vs 1,057 More than 80% better PassMark score
Higher memory bandwidth 98.5 GB/s vs 40 GB/s Around 2.5x higher memory bandwidth
Higher memory clock speed 1,026 MHz vs 625 MHz Around 65% higher memory clock speed
More render output processors 24 vs 16 8 more render output processors
Better sky diver factor score 136.02 vs 97.9 Around 40% better sky diver factor score
Slightly better PassMark direct compute score 822 vs 420 More than 95% better PassMark direct compute score
Front view of GeForce GT 445M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 445M

Report a correction
Lower TDP 35W vs 116W 3.3x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs GT 445M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Read more


comments powered by Disqus