Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 Ti based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details | GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs GT 530 |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
5.3 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 TiGPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 15,553 | vs | 990 | Around 15.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 4,104 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | More than 2.2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 98.5 GB/s | vs | 28.8 GB/s | Around 3.5x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Higher clock speed | 900 MHz | vs | 700 MHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
Better PassMark score | 1,926 | vs | 743 | More than 2.5x better PassMark score | |||
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 9,923 | vs | 3,770 | Around 2.8x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
More render output processors | 24 | vs | 4 | 20 more render output processors | |||
Better sky diver factor score | 136.02 | vs | 65.37 | More than 2x better sky diver factor score | |||
Higher texture rate | 28.8 GTexel/s | vs | 11.2 GTexel/s | More than 2.5x higher texture rate | |||
More texture mapping units | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
Wider memory bus | 192 bit | vs | 128 bit | 50% wider memory bus | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,026 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | Around 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
Slightly better manhattan score | 3,350.43 | vs | 1,704.19 | More than 95% better manhattan score | |||
Better PassMark direct compute score | 822 | vs | 367 | Around 2.2x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| |||||||
Significantly better 3DMark06 score | 8,490 | vs | 2,272 | Around 3.8x better 3DMark06 score | |||
Lower TDP | 50W | vs | 116W | 2.3x lower TDP |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
550 Ti vs 650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | ||
550 Ti vs 730 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
550 Ti vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
550 Ti vs 7770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
550 Ti vs 750 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | ||
550 Ti vs 630 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
550 Ti vs 460 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs R9 380 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs R9 390 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 960 | ||