GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs GT 610 |
Released March, 2011
Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- 900 MHz
- 1 GB GDDR5
6 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Mar, 2011)It makes for a good bargain, but even with overclocked speeds, things don't change much for the GTX 550 Ti in its competitive.
VS
Released May, 2012
ASUS GeForce GT 610
- 810 MHz
- 2 GB DDR3
5.9 Out of 10
by Ryan-Smith (May, 2012)With 96 CUDA cores we’re not 100% sure that this is GF108 as opposed to the 28nm GK117, but as NVIDIA currently has a 28nm capacity bottleneck we can’t see them placing valuable 28nm chips in low-end retail cards.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 550 Ti vs 610 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 TiGPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 15,553 | vs | 560 | More than 27.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 4,104 MHz | vs | 1,200 MHz | Around 3.5x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 98.5 GB/s | vs | 9.6 GB/s | More than 10.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better PassMark score | 1,926 | vs | 354 | Around 5.5x better PassMark score | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 9,923 | vs | 1,820 | Around 5.5x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Much better CLBenchmark raytrace score | 48,088 | vs | 8,914 | Around 5.5x better CLBenchmark raytrace score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 900 MHz | vs | 810 MHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
| More render output processors | 24 | vs | 4 | 20 more render output processors | |||
| Significantly better sky diver factor score | 136.02 | vs | 33.52 | More than 4x better sky diver factor score | |||
| Significantly higher battlefield 3 framerate | 47 | vs | 27 | Around 75% higher battlefield 3 framerate | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,026 MHz | vs | 600 MHz | More than 70% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Higher texture rate | 28.8 GTexel/s | vs | 6.48 GTexel/s | Around 4.5x higher texture rate | |||
| More texture mapping units | 32 | vs | 8 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
| Better face detection score | 18.53 mPixels/s | vs | 2.45 mPixels/s | More than 7.5x better face detection score | |||
| Better manhattan score | 3,531.29 | vs | 962.45 | Around 3.8x better manhattan score | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 822 | vs | 218 | More than 3.8x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Slightly wider memory bus | 192 bit | vs | 64 bit | 3x wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Better 3DMark06 score | 3,910 | vs | 2,272 | More than 70% better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Significantly lower TDP | 29W | vs | 116W | 4x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
