Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 Ti based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details | GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs GT 610 |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
6 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 TiGPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 15,553 | vs | 560 | More than 27.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher effective memory clock speed | 4,104 MHz | vs | 1,200 MHz | Around 3.5x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 98.5 GB/s | vs | 9.6 GB/s | More than 10.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Better PassMark score | 1,926 | vs | 354 | Around 5.5x better PassMark score | |||
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 9,923 | vs | 1,820 | Around 5.5x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
Higher clock speed | 900 MHz | vs | 810 MHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
More render output processors | 24 | vs | 4 | 20 more render output processors | |||
Significantly better sky diver factor score | 136.02 | vs | 33.52 | More than 4x better sky diver factor score | |||
Significantly higher battlefield 3 framerate | 47 | vs | 27 | Around 75% higher battlefield 3 framerate | |||
Slightly better floating-point performance | 691.2 GFLOPS | vs | 155.52 GFLOPS | Around 4.5x better floating-point performance | |||
Higher texture rate | 28.8 GTexel/s | vs | 6.48 GTexel/s | Around 4.5x higher texture rate | |||
Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,026 MHz | vs | 600 MHz | More than 70% higher memory clock speed | |||
Wider memory bus | 192 bit | vs | 64 bit | 3x wider memory bus | |||
More texture mapping units | 32 | vs | 8 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
Better manhattan score | 3,350.43 | vs | 777.57 | More than 4.2x better manhattan score | |||
Better T-Rex score | 1.06 frames/s | vs | 0.23 frames/s | More than 4.5x better T-Rex score | |||
Better PassMark direct compute score | 822 | vs | 218 | More than 3.8x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| |||||||
More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
Better 3DMark06 score | 3,910 | vs | 2,272 | More than 70% better 3DMark06 score | |||
Significantly lower TDP | 29W | vs | 116W | 4x lower TDP |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
GeForce GTX 1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GeForce GTX 960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
Radeon RX 580 vs GeForce GTX 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
GeForce GTX 960 vs 750 Ti | ||