GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 560 Ti vs 610

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games

crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 6 more

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

Passmark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

Passmark Direct Compute and CLBenchmark Raytrace

Noise and Power

How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load

TDP

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power

Winner
MSI GeForce GTX 560 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the MSI GeForce GTX 560 Ti  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Reasons to consider the
MSI GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Report a correction
Significantly better passmark score 3,547 vs 353 More than 10x better passmark score
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 17,648 vs 1,820 Around 9.8x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 4,200 MHz vs 1,200 MHz 3.5x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 16,518 vs 3,910 Around 4.2x better 3DMark06 score
Higher clock speed 950 MHz vs 810 MHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 134.4 GB/s vs 9.6 GB/s More than 14x higher memory bandwidth
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 4,013 vs 560 Around 7.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Better floating-point performance 1,459 GFLOPS vs 155.5 GFLOPS Around 9.5x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 60.8 GTexel/s vs 6.48 GTexel/s Around 9.5x higher texture rate
Significantly more render output processors 32 vs 4 28 more render output processors
Higher pixel rate 15.2 GPixel/s vs 1.62 GPixel/s Around 9.5x higher pixel rate
Significantly better CLBenchmark raytrace score 132,987 vs 8,914 Around 15x better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,050 MHz vs 600 MHz 75% higher memory clock speed
More texture mapping units 64 vs 8 56 more texture mapping units
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 64 bit 4x wider memory bus
Better passmark direct compute score 1,408 vs 203 Around 7x better passmark direct compute score
More shading units 384 vs 48 336 more shading units
Front view of GeForce GT 610

Reasons to consider the
ASUS GeForce GT 610

Report a correction
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Significantly lower TDP 29W vs 170W 5.9x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs GT 610

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance

3DMark06 Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 9 GPU performance

Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

CLBenchmark Raytrace Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do raytracing

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus