GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 560 Ti vs 610 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.9

Overall Score

Winner
MSI GeForce GTX 560 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the MSI GeForce GTX 560 Ti  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Reasons to consider the
MSI GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 16,518 vs 3,910 Around 4.2x better 3DMark06 score
Much better 3DMark vantage graphics score 17,648 vs 1,820 Around 9.8x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Much better manhattan score 3,716.33 vs 970.8 More than 3.8x better manhattan score
Better PassMark score 3,533 vs 358 More than 9.8x better PassMark score
Much higher memory bandwidth 134.4 GB/s vs 9.6 GB/s More than 14x higher memory bandwidth
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 4,200 MHz vs 1,200 MHz 3.5x higher effective memory clock speed
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 4,013 vs 560 Around 7.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher clock speed 950 MHz vs 810 MHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Better floating-point performance 1,459.2 GFLOPS vs 155.52 GFLOPS Around 9.5x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 60.8 GTexel/s vs 6.48 GTexel/s Around 9.5x higher texture rate
Much higher battlefield 3 framerate 52.5 vs 27 Around 95% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Significantly better fire strike factor score 39.65 vs 3.84 More than 10.2x better fire strike factor score
Significantly more render output processors 32 vs 4 28 more render output processors
More texture mapping units 64 vs 8 56 more texture mapping units
Higher pixel rate 15.2 GPixel/s vs 1.62 GPixel/s Around 9.5x higher pixel rate
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,050 MHz vs 600 MHz 75% higher memory clock speed
Significantly better CLBenchmark raytrace score 132,987 vs 8,914 Around 15x better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Better particle simulation score 248.25 mInteraction/s vs 22.04 mInteraction/s More than 11.2x better particle simulation score
More shading units 384 vs 48 336 more shading units
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,400 vs 200 7x better PassMark direct compute score
Slightly wider memory bus 256 bit vs 64 bit 4x wider memory bus
Front view of GeForce GT 610

Reasons to consider the
ASUS GeForce GT 610

Report a correction
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Much lower TDP 29W vs 170W 5.9x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs GT 610

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 560 Ti
86.46 mHash/s
GeForce GT 610
10.05 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 560 Ti
30.7 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 610
2.28 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 3

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus