GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 560 Ti vs 610


Real world tests using the latest 3D games

crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 6 more


Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

PassMark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

PassMark Direct Compute and CLBenchmark Raytrace

Noise and Power

How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load


GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power

MSI GeForce GTX 560 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the MSI GeForce GTX 560 Ti  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Reasons to consider the
MSI GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Report a correction
Much better manhattan score 3,716.33 vs 910.54 More than 4x better manhattan score
Much better 3DMark06 score 16,518 vs 3,910 Around 4.2x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 17,648 vs 1,820 Around 9.8x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better PassMark score 3,540 vs 358 Around 10x better PassMark score
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 4,200 MHz vs 1,200 MHz 3.5x higher effective memory clock speed
Higher clock speed 950 MHz vs 810 MHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 134.4 GB/s vs 9.6 GB/s More than 14x higher memory bandwidth
Significantly higher texture rate 60.8 GTexel/s vs 6.48 GTexel/s Around 9.5x higher texture rate
Much better T-Rex score 3,358.98 vs 1,501.98 Around 2.2x better T-Rex score
Better floating-point performance 1,459 GFLOPS vs 155.5 GFLOPS Around 9.5x better floating-point performance
Slightly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 4,013 vs 560 Around 7.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
More render output processors 32 vs 4 28 more render output processors
Higher pixel rate 15.2 GPixel/s vs 1.62 GPixel/s Around 9.5x higher pixel rate
Significantly better CLBenchmark raytrace score 132,987 vs 8,914 Around 15x better CLBenchmark raytrace score
More texture mapping units 64 vs 8 56 more texture mapping units
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,050 MHz vs 600 MHz 75% higher memory clock speed
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,403 vs 200 More than 7x better PassMark direct compute score
Slightly more shading units 384 vs 48 336 more shading units
Slightly wider memory bus 256 bit vs 64 bit 4x wider memory bus
Front view of GeForce GT 610

Reasons to consider the
ASUS GeForce GT 610

Report a correction
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Significantly lower TDP 29W vs 170W 5.9x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs GT 610

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

GFXBench 3.0 (T-Rex)

GFXBench 3.0 (Manhattan)

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

CLBenchmark Raytrace Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do raytracing

Read more


comments powered by Disqus