Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 560

Reasons to consider the
EVGA GeForce GTX 560

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 900 MHz vs 400 MHz 2.2x higher clock speed
Significantly more render output processors 32 vs 4 28 more render output processors
Better floating-point performance 1,209.6 GFLOPS vs 25.6 GFLOPS 47.2x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 50.4 GTexel/s vs 3.2 GTexel/s Around 15.8x higher texture rate
More texture mapping units 56 vs 8 48 more texture mapping units
Higher pixel rate 12.6 GPixel/s vs 1.6 GPixel/s Around 8x higher pixel rate
More shading units 336 vs 16 320 more shading units
Front view of GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel

Reasons to consider the
Intel GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel

Report a correction
Significantly lower TDP 12W vs 150W 12.5x lower TDP

Features Key features of the GeForce GTX 560  vs 8200M G mGPU Intel 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce GTX 560
12.6 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

GeForce GTX 560
50.4 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

GeForce GTX 560
1,209.6 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs

gpu

GeForce GTX 560  vs
8200M G mGPU Intel 
GPU brand Nvidia Nvidia
GPU name GF114 MCP79
Clock speed 900 MHz 400 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 810 MHz 1 GB None

noise and power

TDP 150W 12W

raw performance

GeForce GTX 560  vs
8200M G mGPU Intel 
Shading units 336 16
Texture mapping units 56 8
Render output processors 32 4
Pixel rate 12.6 GPixel/s 1.6 GPixel/s
Texture rate 50.4 GTexel/s 3.2 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 1,209.6 GFLOPS 25.6 GFLOPS

Comments

comments powered by Disqus