Winner
EVGA GeForce GT 630
GPUBoss recommends the EVGA GeForce GT 630 based on its noise and power.
See full details GeForce GTX 560 vs GT 630 |
Released December, 2011
EVGA GeForce GTX 560
- 900 MHz
- 1 GB GDDR5
7.1 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (May, 2011)Since GPU overclocking provides more performance gain than memory overclocking, overall overclocking potential is still good.
VS
Released June, 2012
EVGA GeForce GT 630
- 810 MHz
- 1 GB GDDR5
6.2 Out of 10
by Doug-Crowthers (Apr, 2012)It is based on the Fermi GF116, which features 144 CUDA cores, 1.5 GB or 3 GB GDDR3 192-bit memory interface, 720 MHz core clock speed, and 891 MHz memory clock speed.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 560 vs 630 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.1 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 133.1 GB/s | vs | 51.2 GB/s | More than 2.5x higher memory bandwidth | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 900 MHz | vs | 810 MHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 4,160 MHz | vs | 3,200 MHz | 30% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly more render output processors | 32 | vs | 4 | 28 more render output processors | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,209.6 GFLOPS | vs | 311.04 GFLOPS | Around 4x better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 50.4 GTexel/s | vs | 12.96 GTexel/s | Around 4x higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly higher FarCry 3 framerate | 75 | vs | 50 | 50% higher FarCry 3 framerate | |||
| Better sky diver factor score | 193.73 | vs | 100.02 | Around 95% better sky diver factor score | |||
| More texture mapping units | 56 | vs | 16 | 40 more texture mapping units | |||
| Slightly higher pixel rate | 12.6 GPixel/s | vs | 3.24 GPixel/s | Around 4x higher pixel rate | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,040 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | 30% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Slightly more shading units | 336 | vs | 96 | 240 more shading units | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly lower TDP | 65W | vs | 150W | 2.3x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 560 vs GT 630
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
FarCry 3
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $75 | $78 | |
| 630 vs 730 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $75 | ||
| 630 vs 650 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $75 | ||
| 630 vs 710 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 560 vs 1050 | ||
| | VS | |
| $78 | ||
| 560 vs 730 | ||
| | VS | |
| 560 vs 650 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 560 vs 750 Ti | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| RX Vega 64 vs 1080 Ti | ||
 | VS |  |
| $316 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $316 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| 1080 vs 1080 Ti | ||
