GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 560M vs 920M among Laptop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.4

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 560M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 15,327 vs 1,731 More than 8.8x better 3DMark06 score
Better PassMark score 1,554 vs 711 Around 2.2x better PassMark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 8,003.5 vs 5,032.5 Around 60% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher memory bandwidth 60 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s Around 4.2x higher memory bandwidth
Higher effective memory clock speed 2,500 MHz vs 1,800 MHz Around 40% higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly wider memory bus 192 bit vs 64 bit 3x wider memory bus
More render output processors 24 vs 16 8 more render output processors
Higher diablo III framerate 44.2 fps vs 36.65 fps More than 20% higher diablo III framerate
Front view of GeForce 920M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 920M

Report a correction
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 9,003.5 vs 1,820 Around 5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher clock speed 954 MHz vs 775 MHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Much better T-Rex score 3,358.92 vs 3,351.06 Almost the same
Higher memory clock speed 900 MHz vs 625 MHz Around 45% higher memory clock speed
Better particle simulation score 161.39 mInteraction/s vs 110.68 mInteraction/s More than 45% better particle simulation score
Slightly more shading units 384 vs 192 Twice as many shading units
Lower TDP 33W vs 75W 2.3x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 560M vs 920M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 560M
44.12 mHash/s
GeForce 920M
40.41 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 560M
13.64 mPixels/s
GeForce 920M
8.36 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 560M
404.62 frames/s
GeForce 920M
157.17 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 560M
3,351.06
GeForce 920M
3,358.92

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 560M
3,327.44
GeForce 920M
3,685.69

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus