GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 560M vs 940M among Laptop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.8

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce 940M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce 940M  based on its gaming.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of GeForce 940M

Nvidia GeForce 940M

GPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 560M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 15,327 vs 2,427 More than 6.2x better 3DMark06 score
Higher memory bandwidth 60 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s Around 4.2x higher memory bandwidth
Slightly better PassMark score 1,554 vs 951 Around 65% better PassMark score
Higher effective memory clock speed 2,500 MHz vs 1,800 MHz Around 40% higher effective memory clock speed
More render output processors 24 vs 8 Three times as many render output processors
Significantly wider memory bus 192 bit vs 64 bit 3x wider memory bus
Front view of GeForce 940M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 940M

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,072 MHz vs 775 MHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 11,920 vs 1,820 More than 6.5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher memory clock speed 900 MHz vs 625 MHz Around 45% higher memory clock speed
Better sky diver factor score 194.59 vs 107.37 More than 80% better sky diver factor score
Higher diablo III framerate 53.8 fps vs 44.2 fps More than 20% higher diablo III framerate
Slightly more shading units 384 vs 192 Twice as many shading units
Better bitcoin mining score 101.28 mHash/s vs 44.12 mHash/s More than 2.2x better bitcoin mining score
Better manhattan score 3,713.26 vs 3,379.02 Around 10% better manhattan score
Lower TDP 33W vs 75W 2.3x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 560M vs 940M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 560M
44.12 mHash/s
GeForce 940M
101.28 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 560M
13.64 mPixels/s
GeForce 940M
25.45 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 560M
404.62 frames/s
GeForce 940M
167.92 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 560M
3,351.92
GeForce 940M
3,360.34

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 560M
3,379.02
GeForce 940M
3,713.26

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus