Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M based on its benchmarks.
See full details GeForce GTX 560M vs GT 740M |
Released May, 2011
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M
- 775 MHz
- 1.5 GB GDDR5
6.8 Out of 10
by Tim-Verry (Jun, 2013)These chips are still based on Kepler (600-series), but feature more CUDA cores, more memory, a wider memory bus, and faster clockspeeds.
VS
Released April, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M
- 810 MHz
- 2 GB DDR3
6.3 Out of 10
by hassan-mujtaba (May, 2014)The core clock is maintained at 993 MHz for the reference models but comes with boost clock which has been absent on the GK107 chips.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 560M vs 740M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.8 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better 3DMark06 score | 15,327 | vs | 10,161 | More than 50% better 3DMark06 score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better PassMark score | 1,554 | vs | 772 | More than 2x better PassMark score | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 8,003.5 | vs | 5,459 | More than 45% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 60 GB/s | vs | 28.83 GB/s | More than 2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 2,500 MHz | vs | 1,802 MHz | Around 40% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| More render output processors | 24 | vs | 16 | 8 more render output processors | |||
| Wider memory bus | 192 bit | vs | 128 bit | 50% wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
| Higher memory clock speed | 901 MHz | vs | 625 MHz | Around 45% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better particle simulation score | 158.65 mInteraction/s | vs | 110.68 mInteraction/s | Around 45% better particle simulation score | |||
| Better manhattan score | 3,698.22 | vs | 3,379.02 | Around 10% better manhattan score | |||
| Slightly more shading units | 384 | vs | 192 | Twice as many shading units | |||
| Lower TDP | 45W | vs | 75W | 40% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 560M vs GT 740M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Battlefield 3
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 740M vs 840M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 740M vs 820M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 740M vs 8750M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 740M vs 8670M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 740M vs 750M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 740M vs R7 M265 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 740M vs 920M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1080 Ti vs RTX 2080 Rev. A | ||
 | VS |  |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $289 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $289 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1080 Ti vs RTX 2080 | ||
 | VS | |
| $289 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
