0 Comments
| GeForce GTX 560M vs GT 740M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 560M vs 740M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly better 3DMark06 score | 15,327 | vs | 10,161 | More than 50% better 3DMark06 score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Better PassMark score | 1,554 | vs | 772 | More than 2x better PassMark score | |||
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 8,003.5 | vs | 5,459 | More than 45% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
Higher memory bandwidth | 60 GB/s | vs | 28.83 GB/s | More than 2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 2,500 MHz | vs | 1,802 MHz | Around 40% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Better manhattan score | 3,327.44 | vs | 2,901.63 | Around 15% better manhattan score | |||
More render output processors | 24 | vs | 16 | 8 more render output processors | |||
Wider memory bus | 192 bit | vs | 128 bit | 50% wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
Higher memory clock speed | 901 MHz | vs | 625 MHz | Around 45% higher memory clock speed | |||
Better particle simulation score | 158.65 mInteraction/s | vs | 110.68 mInteraction/s | Around 45% better particle simulation score | |||
Slightly more shading units | 384 | vs | 192 | Twice as many shading units | |||
Lower TDP | 45W | vs | 75W | 40% lower TDP |
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 560M vs GT 740M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 560M
44.12 mHash/s
GeForce GT 740M
44.7 mHash/s
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 560M
13.64 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 740M
9.37 mPixels/s
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 560M
404.62 frames/s
GeForce GT 740M
157.01 frames/s
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 560M
3,351.06
GeForce GT 740M
3,334
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 560M
3,327.44
GeForce GT 740M
2,901.63
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
GeForce GTX 560M
14.52
GeForce GT 740M
10.29
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
GeForce GTX 560M
107.37
GeForce GT 740M
101.71
Battlefield 3
GeForce GTX 560M
19.2
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
740M vs 840M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
740M vs 820M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
740M vs 8750M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
740M vs 8670M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
740M vs 750M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
740M vs R7 M265 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
740M vs R5 M230 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs R9 380 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs R9 390 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 290X vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 960 | ||