GeForce GTX 560M vs GT 740M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 560M vs 740M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better 3DMark06 score | 15,327 | vs | 10,161 | More than 50% better 3DMark06 score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better PassMark score | 1,554 | vs | 772 | More than 2x better PassMark score | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 8,003.5 | vs | 5,459 | More than 45% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 60 GB/s | vs | 28.83 GB/s | More than 2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 2,500 MHz | vs | 1,802 MHz | Around 40% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Better manhattan score | 3,327.44 | vs | 2,901.63 | Around 15% better manhattan score | |||
| More render output processors | 24 | vs | 16 | 8 more render output processors | |||
| Wider memory bus | 192 bit | vs | 128 bit | 50% wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
| Higher memory clock speed | 901 MHz | vs | 625 MHz | Around 45% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better particle simulation score | 158.65 mInteraction/s | vs | 110.68 mInteraction/s | Around 45% better particle simulation score | |||
| Slightly more shading units | 384 | vs | 192 | Twice as many shading units | |||
| Lower TDP | 45W | vs | 75W | 40% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 560M vs GT 740M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Battlefield 3
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 740M vs 840M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 740M vs 820M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 740M vs 8750M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 740M vs 8670M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 740M vs 750M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 740M vs R7 M265 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 740M vs R5 M230 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS |  |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs R9 380 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 290X vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 750 Ti vs 960 | ||
