Winner
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 750M based on its gaming and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 560M vs GT 750M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 560M vs 750M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.3 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GT 750MGPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Better 3DMark06 score | 15,327 | vs | 13,670 | More than 10% better 3DMark06 score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better PassMark score | 1,554 | vs | 1,288 | More than 20% better PassMark score | |||
| More render output processors | 24 | vs | 16 | 8 more render output processors | |||
| Wider memory bus | 192 bit | vs | 128 bit | 50% wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 941 MHz | vs | 775 MHz | More than 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 4,000 MHz | vs | 2,500 MHz | 60% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Much higher diablo III framerate | 66.6 fps | vs | 44.2 fps | More than 50% higher diablo III framerate | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 625 MHz | 60% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Slightly more shading units | 384 | vs | 192 | Twice as many shading units | |||
| Better manhattan score | 3,570.08 | vs | 3,327.44 | More than 5% better manhattan score | |||
| Slightly better particle simulation score | 146.77 mInteraction/s | vs | 110.68 mInteraction/s | Around 35% better particle simulation score | |||
| Lower TDP | 50W | vs | 75W | Around 35% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 560M vs GT 750M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Battlefield 3
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 850M vs 750M | ||
 | VS | |
| 840M vs 750M | ||
 | VS | |
| 740M vs 750M | ||
 | VS | |
| R7 M265 vs 750M | ||
 | VS | |
| 650M vs 750M | ||
 | VS | |
| 755M vs 750M | ||
 | VS | |
| 660M vs 750M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 390 vs 970 | ||
