0 Comments
| GeForce GTX 560M vs GT 750M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 560M vs 750M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | Nvidia GeForce GT 750MGPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Better 3DMark06 score | 15,327 | vs | 13,670 | More than 10% better 3DMark06 score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Better PassMark score | 1,554 | vs | 1,288 | More than 20% better PassMark score | |||
More render output processors | 24 | vs | 16 | 8 more render output processors | |||
Wider memory bus | 192 bit | vs | 128 bit | 50% wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 941 MHz | vs | 775 MHz | More than 20% higher clock speed | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 4,000 MHz | vs | 2,500 MHz | 60% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Much higher diablo III framerate | 66.6 fps | vs | 44.2 fps | More than 50% higher diablo III framerate | |||
Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 625 MHz | 60% higher memory clock speed | |||
Slightly more shading units | 384 | vs | 192 | Twice as many shading units | |||
Better manhattan score | 3,570.08 | vs | 3,327.44 | More than 5% better manhattan score | |||
Slightly better particle simulation score | 146.77 mInteraction/s | vs | 110.68 mInteraction/s | Around 35% better particle simulation score | |||
Lower TDP | 50W | vs | 75W | Around 35% lower TDP |
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 560M vs GT 750M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 560M
44.12 mHash/s
GeForce GT 750M
27.59 mHash/s
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 560M
13.64 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 750M
16.18 mPixels/s
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 560M
404.62 frames/s
GeForce GT 750M
251.62 frames/s
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 560M
3,351.06
GeForce GT 750M
3,360.34
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 560M
3,327.44
GeForce GT 750M
3,570.08
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
GeForce GTX 560M
14.52
GeForce GT 750M
23.78
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
GeForce GTX 560M
107.37
GeForce GT 750M
147.38
Battlefield 3
GeForce GTX 560M
19.2
GeForce GT 750M
12.8
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
850M vs 750M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
840M vs 750M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
740M vs 750M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R7 M265 vs 750M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
755M vs 750M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
650M vs 750M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
860M vs 750M | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 380 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 390 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs R9 290X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 970 | ||