Winner
GeForce GTX 1070
GPUBoss recommends the GeForce GTX 1070 based on its benchmarks, compute performance and noise and power.
See full details GeForce GTX 570 vs 1070 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 570 vs 1070 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 9.8 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Generic GeForce GTX 1070GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Wider memory bus | 320 bit | vs | 256 bit | 25% wider memory bus | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Much better PassMark score | 11,028 | vs | 4,412 | Around 2.5x better PassMark score | |||
| Much higher clock speed | 1,506 MHz | vs | 797 MHz | Around 90% higher clock speed | |||
| Much more memory | 8,192 MB | vs | 1,280 MB | Around 6.5x more memory | |||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 8,008 MHz | vs | 3,900 MHz | More than 2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Much better floating-point performance | 5,783 GFLOPS | vs | 1,530 GFLOPS | More than 3.8x better floating-point performance | |||
| Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 256.3 GB/s | vs | 156 GB/s | Around 65% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Much higher pixel rate | 96.4 GPixel/s | vs | 23.91 GPixel/s | More than 4x higher pixel rate | |||
| Much higher texture rate | 180.7 GTexel/s | vs | 47.82 GTexel/s | More than 3.8x higher texture rate | |||
| Much better manhattan score | 26,833.24 | vs | 3,473.94 | Around 7.8x better manhattan score | |||
| Much better fire strike factor score | 87.79 | vs | 38.44 | More than 2.2x better fire strike factor score | |||
| Significantly more shading units | 1,920 | vs | 480 | 1440 more shading units | |||
| Much better PassMark direct compute score | 6,724 | vs | 1,653 | More than 4x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Much higher memory clock speed | 2,002 MHz | vs | 975 MHz | More than 2x higher memory clock speed | |||
| Much higher bioshock infinite framerate | 132.5 | vs | 45.5 | Around 3x higher bioshock infinite framerate | |||
| Significantly more render output processors | 64 | vs | 40 | 24 more render output processors | |||
| Significantly more texture mapping units | 120 | vs | 60 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
| Better ocean surface simulation score | 1,727.43 frames/s | vs | 1,263.72 frames/s | More than 35% better ocean surface simulation score | |||
| Lower TDP | 150W | vs | 219W | More than 30% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
